Here is a very telling picture relating to the Occupy Movement I found on James Delingpole's blog
Sure there are problems with the the big end of town, its full of fallen human beings but the big end of town doesn't have a mortgage on greed corruption and selfishness. You will find that all through society top to bottom but this movement seems to be less about lack of competition and corporate collusion and seems to come more from the idea that there is only a certain amount of money in the system, that ''those'' people have wealth and I don't, and the reason I don't have it is because they have it. When in reality if the corporation didn't take risks and create the wealth nobody would have it, the reason they have the wealth is because they sell things people want, and they employ people to make the laptops, I Phone's and other paraphernalia that most of the occupiers seem to rely on. They seem to be in the position of the person cutting away the branch that they are standing on. After all, once you hand over your cash and receive your product you are hardly in a position to ask for your money back.
